Negotiating Academic Legitimacy through Politeness and Authorship Ethics: A Micro-Analytic Study of Digital Academic Communication

Arie Yuandani, I Made Juliarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62795/fjlg.v4i1.447

Keywords:

politeness theory, academic communication, authorship ethics, autoethnography, higher education

Abstract

This article examines a short digital interaction between an early-career researcher and a senior linguistics lecturer in order to explore how academic legitimacy, politeness, and authorship ethics are negotiated in everyday scholarly communication. Although the interaction takes place in an informal WhatsApp exchange, it reveals that linguistic choices are not merely interpersonal ornaments but also ethical and epistemic strategies within hierarchical academic relations. Using Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory together with COPE and ICMJE authorship principles, this study adopts a micro-analytic autoethnographic approach to examine how lexical mitigation, syntactic softening, and implied meanings work to manage face threats, defer premature authorship claims, and protect intellectual autonomy. The analysis suggests that politeness in this context functions as a practical ethical resource that helps regulate the pace of scholarly claims and maintain integrity in asymmetrical academic relationships.

References

Bennett, D. M., & Taylor, D. M. (2011). The ethics of collaborative authorship. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 12(1), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v12i1.267

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (n.d.). Authorship and contributorship. Retrieved from https://publicationethics.org

Demeter, E., McBride, A., Holladay-Sandidge, H., Rasmussen, L. M., Banks, G. C., & Hall- Hertel, K. (2025). Intervention to promote ethical authorship practices in graduate education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00548-x

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Ibrahim, K., Weller, S., Elvidge, E., & Tavener, M. (2023). Using collaborative autoethnography to explore the teaching of qualitative research methods in medicine. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 28, 1467–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-023-10224-z

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2024). Defining the role of authors and contributors. Retrieved from https://www.icmje.org

Keles, U. (2022). Autoethnography as a recent methodology in applied linguistics: A methodological review. The Qualitative Report, 27(2), 448–474. https://doi.org/ 10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5131

Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.

Macfarlane, B. (2017). The ethics of academic authorship: The possibility of a ‘virtue’ approach. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1247–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009

Street, J. M., Rogers, W. A., Israel, M., & Braunack-Mayer, A. J. (2010). Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 70(9), 1458–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.013

Additional Files

Published

2026-07-16

How to Cite

Negotiating Academic Legitimacy through Politeness and Authorship Ethics: A Micro-Analytic Study of Digital Academic Communication: Arie Yuandani, I Made Juliarta. (2026). Focus Journal: Language Review, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.62795/fjlg.v4i1.447

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.