Environmental Law: A Perspective on Harmonizing Waste Management Regulations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62795/fjl.v6i1.443Keywords:
Harmonization, Revision, Environment, Management, WasteAbstract
The increasing volume of waste generated by households/industries (upstream) and the increasing population density from year to year, in this case, the increasing population in each region, has led to an increase in the amount of waste generated by households/industries. Therefore, a revision of Government Regulation Number 81 of 2012 concerning the Management of Household Waste and Household-Like Waste is crucial. The purpose of this study is to provide a model for reviewing the revision of Government Regulation Number 81 of 2012 concerning the Management of Household Waste and Household-Like Waste, by harmonizing Government Regulation Number 81 of 2012 with the provisions of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection
and Management, to avoid normative conflicts in the application of waste management regulations. The research method used is a normative juridical research method, implemented through a statutory regulatory approach, a literature review, and a comparative legal approach to obtain research results. The research findings demonstrate the importance of revising Government Regulation No. 81 of 2012 concerning the Management of Household Waste and Household-Like Waste. This is necessary because Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and Law No. 18 of 2008 concerning Waste Management emphasize criminal penalties for improperly managed Final Disposal Sites (TPA) that pollute the environment. However, Government Regulation No. 81 of 2012 concerning Waste Management focuses more on administrative technicalities (transportation/disposal) than on criminal acts of pollution, creating ambiguity in the application of criminal articles specifically related to environmental
pollution.
References
Choudhury, N. (2017). “Revisiting critical legal pluralism: Normative contestations in the afghan courtroom”. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 4 (1), p. 229–255
Diantha, I.M.P., 2016, Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta, p. 129.
Galuh, G. L. P. (2024). Perbandingan pengelolaan sampah di negara Indonesia dan negara Singapura. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 9(1), 88-105, p. 92.
Irwansyah, I. 2020. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode Dan Praktek Penelitan Artikel, ed. by Ahsan Yunus, Cet.3 Mirra Buana Medi, Yogyakarta
Jennifer, J., Davis, R., & Cristabella, N. (2025). Pengendalian Pengelolaan Sampah Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hukum: Studi Banding Peraturan Pengelolaan Sampah di Singapura. Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 9(3), 314-331, p. 318.
Jambeck, J.R. et al., (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science Journal, 374(6223), p.768-71.
Maulina, A.S., 2012. Identifikasi Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pemilahan Sampah Di Kecamatan Cimahi Utara Serta Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 23(3), p.177-96.
Marzuki, P. M., 2005, Penelitian Hukum, edisi revisi, Prenadamedia, Jakarta, p. 13.
Nurhidayat, S. P., Mengolah Sampah Untuk Pupuk dan Pestisida Organik. Jakarta: Penebar
Swadaya, 2010.
Putra, A. G. S. W., Dewi, N. L. P. M., & Maharani, S. E. (2025). Tantangan implementasi circular economy dalam pengelolaan sampah perkotaan (studi kasus: kota Denpasar). Jurnal Ecocentrism, 5(2), 82-92
Rumiartha, I. N. P. B. (2022). Correlation Theory A.V. Dicey Perspective of the Rule of Law in Indonesia: Correlation Theory A.V. Dicey Perspective of the Rule of Law in Indonesia. Focus Journal Law Review, 2(1). https://ojs.balidwipa.ac.id/index.php/fjl/article/view/19
Rumiartha, I. N. P. B., Astariyani, N. L. G., & Indradewi, A.A.S. (2022). Human Rights of Indigenous People in Indonesia: A Constitutional Approach. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 15(2), 395-402.http://journal.yiil.org/home/archives_v15n2_10
Sulistyorini, L., (2005). Pengelolaan sampah dengan cara menjadikannya kompos. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan, 2(1).
Siems, M. M., & Mac Síthigh, D. (2021). “Mapping legal research”. Cambridge Law Journal, 71 (3), p. 651–676
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 I Gusti Ayu Putri Kartika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication and other non-exclusive publishing rights with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Online ISSN:
Article Template
Open Access Policy
Aims & Scope
Editorial Team
Author Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review Process
Copyright & Licensing
Article Processing Charge
Contact
About the Journal
Plagiarism Policy
Archiving Policy




