Vicarious Liability Theory on Vicarious Liability  on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the context of Cryptocurrency

Ayu Pramachanti Rumiartha; Timotius Nico Yogatama

doi:10.62795/fjl.v4i1.255

Authors

Ayu Pramachanti Rumiartha Bachelor of Law, Bali Dwipa University, Indonesia
Timotius Nico Yogatama Researcher, Plekhanov Russian State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62795/fjl.v4i1.255

Keywords:

Vicarious Liability, Artificial Intelligence, Cryptocurrency

Abstract

This study aims to discuss and analyze how substitute accountability in Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the context of Cryptocurrency, analyzed with Vicarious Liability theory. The use of Artificial Intelligence is also often used in the business of digital money transactions, for example such as cryptocurrency. Technological developments have given birth to various kinds of alternative tools or instruments as a substitute for money, which could be possible for violations of the law in the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in cryptocurrency transactions. The research method used in this study is a type of normative legal research method. In normative legal research, a study that leads to the process of finding legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines that function to answer legal issues faced. The choice of the type of normative legal research in this study is related to the analysis of Vicarious Liability Theory in the context of substitute liability in Artificial Intelligence (AI). The results of the study show the importance of understanding the theory of Vicarious Liability as a theory that determines substitute liability in Artificial Intelligence (AI), this is because the use of Artificial Intelligence is also often used in the business of digital money transactions, for example such as cryptocurrency, so it does not rule out the possibility that the AI does not carry out actions in accordance with AI commands which will certainly harm all parties, including business consumers of digital financial transactions in the event of a digital transaction error, then the person responsible is not the AI subject but the subject who from the beginning provides the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in cryptocurrency transactions.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Eli Dourado and Jerry Brito, (2014), Bitcoin - Solving Double Spending, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, London, hlm. 4.

Ferry Mulyanto, (2015), Utilization of Cryptocurrency as the Application of Rupiah Currency into Digital Form Using Bitcoin Technology, IJNS – Indonesian Journal on Networking and Security – Volume. 4 No. 4, p. 7.

Haruli Dwicaksana Pujiyono. (2020). "Legal Effects Arising from Cryptocurrency as a Payment Instrument in Indonesia", Journal of Private Law Civil Affairs Section, Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/privatlaw/article/view/48407/29941, accessed March 5, 2024.

Lili Rasjidi & Ira Thania Rasjidi, (2002). Introduction to Legal Philosophy, Mandar Maju, Bandung, p. 74.

Mukti fajar and Achmad Yulianto, (2015). Dualism of Normative & Empirical Legal Research, Student Library, Yogyakarta, p. 280

Nur Kholis, (2018). "Banking in the New Digital Era", Journal of Economicus 12, No. 1 (80-88)

Putri, Anggia Dasa and Dapit Pratama. (2017).“ Expert System Detects Cybercrime Using Web-Based Forward Chaining Method in Batam City", Journal of Edik Informatika 3, No. 2 (197-210), p. 199

Prabu Buana Rumiartha, I. N. (2022). Correlation Theory A.V. Dicey Perspective of the Rule of Law in Indonesia: Correlation Theory A.V. Dicey Perspective of the Rule of Law in Indonesia. Focus Journal Law Review, 2(1). https://ojs.balidwipa.ac.id/index.php/fjl/article/view/19

Riswandi, S. &. (2021). Juridical Analysis of the Guidance and Formation of Inmates in Class Correctional Institutions I, 1, 101–108.

Rumiartha, I. N. P. B., Astariyani, N. L. G., & Indradewi, A.A.S. (2022). Human Rights of Indigenous People in Indonesia: A Constitutional Approach. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 15(2), 395-402. http://journal.yiil.org/home/archives_v15n2_10

Rumiartha, I. N. P. B., Astariyani, N. L. G., & Amaral, A. M. (2022). The Comparative Law on the Distribution of Power in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the Constitution of the Republic Timor Leste. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 10(3), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i3.1134

Rumiartha, I.P., Indradewi, A.S., & Gomes, A. (2023). Comparative Law on the Authority of the House of Representatives (Indonesia) with the National Parliament (Timor Leste). SASI, 29(1), 18-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i1.1075.

Rais Ahmad, (2007). The Role of Humans in Law Enforcement, Pustaka Antara, Jakarta, p. 19

Soerjono Soekanto, (2014). Introduction to Legal Research, University of Indonesia Press, Jakarta, p.2.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, (1999). Knowing the law An Introduction, Liberty, Yogyakarta, p. 71.

Untung Rahardja. (2018). Application of Blockchain Technology as a Media for Securing the E-Commerce Transaction Process. Journal of Computer Engineering Systems and Science. Vol. 5 No.1, available on https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/cess/article/view/14893, accessed March 5, 2024.